Editors
JEP reviewers
How to become a reviewer
To become a reviewer, submit a curriculum vitae and a notice of intent to Dr. Rose Ylimaki.
Reviewer instructions
Good peer reviewers play a crucial part in the advancement of a profession. The essential goal of the blind peer review process is to maximize the quality of published research in a field of scholarly inquiry. A reviewer has obligations to three audiences:
The editors of the journal rely on reviewers to be thorough, prompt, and fair. The editors expect to be provided with:
- detailed but concise assessments of manuscript quality,
- a clear recommendation about whether the paper should be rejected, revised, or accepted, and
- feedback to authors that will be helpful in crafting a revision (or submission to another journal).
The authors rely on reviewers to be constructive, reasoned, explicit, and ethical. A submitted manuscript is confidential; do not discuss, copy, or quote it. Identify both the strengths and the weaknesses of the paper. When serving as a reviewer, be aware of your biases or preferences. Do not be superficial or dismissive. Consider how you can help the author(s) to improve their study.
We hope to serve as a valuable resource for educational leaders, teachers, policymakers, scholars, and graduate students by shedding light on the practical implications of policy decisions and their implementation.
Reviewers
- Stacey Berklan
- Karyn Blair
- Gayle Blanchard
- Howard Carlson
- Kwang-Lee Chu
- Nicholas Clement
- Sarah Collins
- Ali Conant
- Walter Delecki
- Mary Dereshiwsky
- Walter Delecki
- Mary Dereshiwsky
- Robyn Conrad Hansen
- Randy Hendricks
- Barbara Hickman
- Tom Hughes
- Steve Jeras
- Sue Kater
- Renea Kennedy
- Renea Kennedy
- Stephen Lawton
- Joseph Martin
- Gretchen McAllister
- Amy McCarthy
- Anders Olofsson
- Anthony Osborn
- Gabriela Ramos
- Emily Schlittenhart
- Michael Schwanenberger
- Marisel Schweitzer
- Laura Sujo de Montes
- Aimee Sulit
- Gary L. Thrift
- Kris Treat
- Chih-Hsiung Tu