Good peer reviewers play a crucial part in the advancement of a profession<\/em>. The essential goal of the blind peer review process is to maximize the quality of published research in a field of scholarly inquiry. A reviewer has obligations to three audiences:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n \n
\n
The editors of the journal Accordion Closed<\/span><\/h4>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n
\n \n\n
The editors of the journal rely on reviewers to be thorough, prompt, and fair. The editors expect to be provided with:<\/div>\n
\n
detailed but concise assessments of manuscript quality,<\/li>\n
a clear recommendation about whether the paper should be rejected, revised, or accepted, and<\/li>\n
feedback to authors that will be helpful in crafting a revision (or submission to another journal).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/div><\/body><\/html>\n\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n \n
\n
The author(s) of the paper Accordion Closed<\/span><\/h4>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n
\n \n\n
The authors rely on reviewers to be constructive, reasoned, explicit, and ethical. A submitted manuscript is confidential; do not discuss, copy, or quote it. Identify both the strengths and the weaknesses of the paper. When serving as a reviewer, be aware of your biases or preferences. Do not be superficial or dismissive. Consider how you can help the author(s) to improve their study.<\/div>\n
<\/div><\/body><\/html>\n\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n \n
\n
Scholars and practitioners in the profession Accordion Closed<\/span><\/h4>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n
\n \n\n
We hope to serve as a valuable resource for educational leaders, teachers, policymakers, scholars, and graduate students by shedding light on the practical implications of policy decisions and their implementation.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div><\/body><\/html>\n\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Reviewers<\/h2>\n
\n
Stacey Berklan<\/a><\/li>\n
Karyn Blair<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Gayle Blanchard<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Howard Carlson<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Kwang-Lee Chu<\/a><\/li>\n
Nicholas Clement<\/a><\/li>\n
Sarah Collins<\/a><\/li>\n
Ali Conant<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Walter Delecki<\/a><\/li>\n
Mary Dereshiwsky<\/a><\/li>\n
Walter Delecki<\/a><\/li>\n
Mary Dereshiwsky<\/a><\/li>\n
Robyn Conrad Hansen<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Randy Hendricks<\/a><\/li>\n
Barbara Hickman<\/a><\/li>\n
Tom Hughes<\/a><\/li>\n
Steve Jeras<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Sue Kater<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Renea Kennedy<\/a><\/li>\n
Renea Kennedy<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Stephen Lawton<\/a><\/li>\n
Joseph Martin<\/a><\/li>\n
Gretchen McAllister<\/a><\/li>\n
Amy McCarthy<\/a><\/li>\n
Anders Olofsson<\/a><\/li>\n
Anthony Osborn<\/a><\/li>\n
Gabriela Ramos<\/a><\/li>\n
Emily Schlittenhart<\/a><\/li>\n
Michael Schwanenberger<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Marisel Schweitzer<\/a><\/li>\n
Laura Sujo de Montes<\/a><\/li>\n
Aimee Sulit<\/a><\/li>\n
Gary L. Thrift<\/a><\/li>\n
Kris Treat<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
Chih-Hsiung Tu<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Editors<\/h3>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
Editor
\nDr. Rose Ylimaki<\/a><\/p>\n
Associate Editor
\n Dr. Mary Dereshiwsky<\/a><\/p>\n
Associate Editor
\n Dr. Frank Davidson<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
JEP reviewers How to become a reviewer To become a reviewer, submit a curriculum vitae and a notice of intent to Dr. Rose Ylimaki. Reviewer instructions Good peer reviewers play a crucial part in the advancement of a profession. The essential goal of the blind peer review process is to maximize the quality of published […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","ring_central_script_selection":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-151","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/in.nau.edu\/ejournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/in.nau.edu\/ejournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/in.nau.edu\/ejournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/in.nau.edu\/ejournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/in.nau.edu\/ejournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/in.nau.edu\/ejournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/151\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":643,"href":"https:\/\/in.nau.edu\/ejournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/151\/revisions\/643"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/in.nau.edu\/ejournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

JEP reviewers<\/h1>\n

How to become a reviewer<\/h2>\n
To become a reviewer, submit a curriculum vitae and a notice of intent to Dr. Rose Ylimaki<\/a>.<\/p>\n

JEP reviewers<\/h1>\n

How to become a reviewer<\/h2>\nTo become a reviewer, submit a curriculum vitae and a notice of intent to Dr. Rose Ylimaki<\/a>.<\/p>\n

How to become a reviewer<\/h2>\n
To become a reviewer, submit a curriculum vitae and a notice of intent to Dr. Rose Ylimaki<\/a>.<\/p>\n